
Tax day is almost upon us. Most of you have probably already filed (and gotten a refund, based on the market’s performance last year). I got my best refund ever this year (thanks largely to an 8 lb, 3 oz deduction), but I am not optimistic about the future.
With all the bailouts, stimulus plans, and funding of pork barrel projects, you and I will be picking up the tab for many years to come. Whether or not you agree with the way Washington has been writing checks, you have to acknowledge the fact that our actions today will have significant financial implications for years to come.
I’m not here to point fingers at any particular politician, party, or belief. I think we should instead consider why the government feels so compelled to “fix” the economy.
It really comes down to the average American’s sense of entitlement. One of the most famous lines from our country’s Declaration of Independence states that we are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.
That’s the pursuit of happiness, not the guarantee of happiness.
First of all, if we are to pursue happiness, then the onus is on us (get it?) to discover what will provide happiness. If you’ve read much on this blog before, you know my position on this matter. Money will not provide happiness. Yet when people are not happy, our typical response is to throw money at the problem. When that money runs out and the problem still exists, we throw more money at it (ever heard of AIG).
Our government is really good at collecting taxes and organizing a military. That’s about it. It cannot be all things to all people, nor should it be. We should not be turning to the government to bail out businesses, provide universal healthcare, regulate financial services, or guarantee the liquidity of our investments. Yet over and over again, when we face tough times, we expect the government to reach into its hat and pull out another rabbit.
Another problem that I don’t think we are considering is the issue of control. The more money the government puts into an entity, the more control it gains over it. Look at GM. After giving the car maker tons of cash, the administration forced the resignation of GM’s CEO. What about the AIG bonus fiasco? After the ridiculous bonuses were paid, the government decided to heavily tax those bonuses. I’m not defending GM’s former CEO or AIG, but doesn’t this seem to be going a bit far?
Now the government is saying that it will back the warranties on new GM cars and trucks. What? So does this mean that Ford owners will subsidize the cost of quality for GM vehicles with their taxes?
The more involved the government gets, the more complicated these scenarios become. As individuals, we need to take personal accountability for our pursuit of happiness and keep in mind that if we turn to bailouts for happiness, we lose liberty.
